Humor at its sickest
When 90% Say No To No Avail, It's Not Democracy
Published on April 21, 2004 By mikimouse In Politics
The US is leading the charge against Spain and saying their actions are a victory for the terrorists. But of course that is the ignorant way of looking at it. Let's think. What's democracy? It's being able to vote for representatives who will represent them. One-person-one-vote. We know this. So when 90% of Spain was telling their politicians: "Don't send the men to Iraq without the UN, don't send them to war or false pretenses" and their politicians sent them anyways to suck up the US, that's not democracy. The huge majority of Spain said no, so their leaders should have listened. The new leader has acted like a true representative of his people. As opposition leader, he said if elected he would recall the troops back to Spain. And he did. When was the last time a US president followed through with his pre-election promises? Think about it for a year. Good luck. Thank the Lord there is a government somewhere who actually listens to its people and responds in kind. Sending troops to Iraq over huge majority protests was a travesty of democracy which should have infuriated the free world. But instead an act of true and real democracy is villified as wrong and they take to cowardly position by saying it's supporting terrorists. I don't support terrorists. I support democracy. Do you?
Comments (Page 5)
7 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7 
on Apr 28, 2004
A government has a responsibility to listen to it's citizens. It has no right however to interfere in the democratic rights of other countries citizens.

When people protest in country A about the actions of country B they are expressing their democratic rights.
If government A interferes with country B's actions then it is being undemocratic.

As for the arguement of appleasement, let me return the question from the Spanish point of view. Iraq had nothing to do with the war on terrorism. Europe sees this why doesn't the US? The only appleasement going on was appleasing the US by being involved in it's imperial objectives.

It's all a matter of perspective. If you believe the war in Iraq is beneficial against the war on terror then you'll never support the Spanish position. Likewise, if you believe the war in Iraq was not part of the war on terror then you'll never supprot the US position.

Paul.
on Apr 28, 2004

The governments of Germany and France put all the pressure they could muster on the United States to not go into Iraq. Trying to argue otherwise is very dishonest. They were very vocal, particularly Schroeder and Chirac, in telling the US what it should and shouldn't do.

If it's okay for them to do that, then it's certianly okay for the US government to express its opinion about what Spain should or shouldn't do.

If Spain wants to demonstrate its collective cowardice, which is how the move is generally received here by the citizens of the United States, that's their right as a democracy. Maybe they'll be lucky and the terrorists won't hurt them anymore and instead go after more immediate threats.

on Apr 28, 2004

huh? I'm all for truth and real democracy. When a go'vt ignores it's people, it's not democracy. Right or wrong.

And Americans overwhelmingly were in favor of going into Iraq. Therefore, it's democracy in action and when France went out of its way to tell the US how wrong it was, it was subverting democracy? I don't think so. But it's the same thing the US has done with Spain. Our government has a responsibility to ITS people to work towards its interests and Spain being in Iraq meant that fewer Americans would be killed in Iraq. Someone has to step in now where Spain was. 

If it was my son serving in Iraq, you'd bet your ass I'd want my government to do whatever it took to keep Spain in there. Because of Spain's withdrawal, someone else's sons are going to have to pick up the slack. More Americans are going to die because of Spain leaving. Therefore I would expect my government to try to keep Spain there.

But don't let cold hard truth get in the way of your intellectual masterbation on these distant philosophical issues.

on Apr 28, 2004
Lol. All of a sudden France is a force to even think about? I'm sure you were one of the ones on the anti-french rampage what with they're being rude to 'their saviors" and whatnot. Now you use them as an example in things having to do with world power and relevant politics? Silly. Spain did what the people wanted. The previous admin didn't. That's why they were voted out. This is how it happened. Spain's people said 'don't send our men to Iraq in an unjust non-UN war'...the government didn't listen and sent them anyways. Elections were coming up. Some entity blew up trains and killed lots of people. The people were angry the war on terror, the war they didn't want, had hit them at home. Guaranteed each voter held the thought 'if the gov't listened to us and didn't send the troops to Iraq the terrorists would never have targeted us'. So they voted with their brains this time. It's hilarious the spin most try put on this, that it's a victory for terrorism. It was the prime example of what can happen when a supposed democratic gov't doesn't listen to its people. Enough said. To say Spain is running away is true only in the context that they should never have been in the eye of the storm anyways. They shouldn't have been sent there. The new gov't got its priorities straight. Bravo for them. The US could learn lots and lots from Spain and their employ of real democracy. They deserve our utmost praise.
on Apr 28, 2004

Ah so your argument is that the US is to be held to a different standard than France. Okay, that explains much of what you write.

As for "real" democracy, again, Americans support the war in Iraq. That's "real" democracy in action.

on Apr 28, 2004
Well said, mikimouse.

It is pretty clear that the US as a country has little or no respect for democratic procedures abroad. The threats and pressure the US applied to Europe prior to, and after the invasion reveals a blatant disregard for the sovereignity of other countries. The message I'm seeing is: We run the show. Anyone not willing to "play ball" with the US risk facing sanctions. Doesn't sound very democratic to me.

Voicing an opinion is one thing, trying to bully governments into changing their position is quite another. I welcome the change of leadership in Spain. As you said, real democracy!
on Apr 28, 2004
I guess my problem is that, supposedly, criticizing Spain is "bullying", yet criticizing the U.S. is perfectly fine. Again, I guess you have to hate the U.S. and love those against the U.S. to understand this logic.
on Apr 28, 2004
Voicing an opinion is one thing, trying to bully governments into changing their position is quite another


on Apr 28, 2004
So the U.S. is doing absolutely nothing wrong by voicing its opinion about Spain then.
on Apr 28, 2004
You really lost me there...Maybe you should reread what I posted and comment on something I said.
on Apr 28, 2004
I don't see anything that suggests that the U.S. was bullied anybody.
on Apr 28, 2004
draginol said: "Ah so your argument is that the US is to be held to a different standard than France. Okay, that explains much of what you write."
go away and play little fella. How you came up with that is too beyond reality for me. Sorry though.
on Apr 28, 2004
"criticizing Spain is "bullying", yet criticizing the U.S. is perfectly fine"
well, consider the US as the biggest toughest guy in the schoolyard, then think of Spain an an ant. Open thee eyeees.
on Apr 28, 2004
So Draginol was right. It's a double standard.
on Apr 28, 2004

Link

Link

Link

It's common knowledge. Feel free to question the sources....I'm done with this.
7 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7